@manhandler re: Sydney - it was actually the other way ariound
140 were UNvaccinated - he got it wrong and a few secs later apologised and corrected himself
@manhandler re: Sydney - it was actually the other way ariound
140 were UNvaccinated - he got it wrong and a few secs later apologised and corrected himself
These are first hand eye witnesses, with video. It's not hearsay you incompetent fool. And yes, we've already seen the videos!!! We know Trump won. There is nothing to concede.
I was not attacking either of you.. just discussing things - don't attack others on here just because they share a diff view point (red or blue or freaking pink) If the extreme sides (both) on here were not so ready to attack eachother then more might join in in discussions
I simply stated the truth.. the courts can't do anything without def legal proof (heavily edited videos with no context are going to get thrown out no matter how true they are). I was not rude or taking sides just stated facts.. IF there is clear legal evidence (whether its video or watermarks or whatever) then roll on Trump for four more years
Anyway, this "incompotent fool" is outta here for another long while - hope it all pans out and maybe the US gets some well deserved peace and quiet.. but i doubt it
Why were Repub vote observers prevented from watching the counts in several states?
This has yet to be proven - true or not (no matter what you strongly believe) these allegations need more proof
The thing is most of these allegations have not been proven - they are purely hearsay 3rd party allegations with no actual proof.. Until they are proven then they are just allegations and therefore will mean nothing in a court of law
some of these so called allegations and issues brought to court by Trump et al have been thrown out of court within hours as they have nothing to back them up - at this point it feels like they are just throwing stuff at a wall and hoping something sticks
In PA, they are allowing ballots where the signatures don't match.
Which is not fraud/illegal since they are not even checking - PA “does not authorize or require county election boards to reject absentee or mail-in ballots…based on an analysis of a voter’s signature.”
so it doesnt helps or hinder either side
Ilhan Omar's district already has a ballot harvesting scandal that the FBI is looking at.
People WANT FBI to to look in to it but the FBI has made no indication they are at all - the project veritas video was even debunked by Jamal (the guy who took it ) but by then it was shared and believed by so many that the fact that he said he had no actual proof was ignored
Well! It has been revealed today that the official ballots were watermarked with non radioactive isotopes, because Trump knew that they'd do this. Democratic operatives copied them without knowing it, meaning, Trump and the military know where all the official ballots went, what was thrown away, and all the counterfeit ballots can be weeded out and people can be arrested. There's more proof than just the ballots too. It's on video, election officials kicking out GOP poll watchers and declaring that Trump votes get destroyed. He just busted them in a sting operation and that's why he's been quiet the last few days, allowing them to dig their own grave even further. It's called QFS Blockchain Encryption. This is a crypto watermark that can only be seen under a black-light, made by a special printer only by officially designated printers. Also Trump got 28% of the vote from the gay and trans community. Cheers!
:afr:
You do know that there is no federal system for ballots right? Each state take care of their own ballot papers etc Trump has no way of putting anything on them - in fact if he did that is technically HIM tampering not the other way around but he hasn't because it would be impossible for him to do so
@bc22:
One thing that stood out as a possibility is that Trump's followers were told not to vote via mail/absentee/drop-off and to instead vote at the polls, and they did so.
Those not following Trump and/or worried more about Covid-19 used mail/absentee/drop-off and it is those that were recently (and are being) counted.
President Trump was a huge influence in a lot of his supporters voting in person - they then did exactly that, in most cases.
Covid fears also played a part on this
This + plus the fact that states all count differently (some count mail ins at the end etc) means each side got large quantities of votes counted at once (Trump at start and Biden much later) which led to people falsely saying its rigged/fraudulent etc
Record number of votes were cast.. which I think is amazing BUT just shows why and how tight the race is - people are polarised.. but that is a seperate discussion
Just putting my opinion out there
but this seems sleeker now & def more modern
It is more compact than most would be used to but even using it for the first couple of minutes, it seems very easy to navigate
I was looking up something else and came across this!
He wrote Love! Valour! Compassion! & Kiss Of The Spider Woman
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2020/mar/25/terrence-mcnally-obituary
A giant of the American theater, Terrence McNally has died of complications from COVID-19. An 81-year-old lung cancer survivor with chronic pulmonary disease, McNally died in a Sarasota, Fla., hospital, according to Deadline.
While celebrities such as Tom Hanks, Rita Wilson, Idris Elba, and Andy Cohen have tested positive for the virus that is now a pandemic, McNally is the highest-profile person to die of COVID-19.
There was the new movie 1917 and also Aladdin.
But an example and others might disagree is a Madonna Concert.
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=9aacbb372b7d58b3ac2aeb60fd392c6833e49636c22c2269
I personally think Madonna is a no but i can see that could open a whole debate (I just don't think a gay icon is enough to be intrepreted as following the rules)
If they allow Madonna (except "The Next Best Thing" - her gay themed movie) then we could have Barbra Streisand Movies all over the site or a 100gb judy garland file of all of her work etc
bearbearbear.
I think they might have already been taken down. I also reported a few over the past couple of days.
Do you remember what any of them were?
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=a6dfac0ba6a0a7f138de53b654d1a634eb1c5c949d93c561
This is one.. its basically a straight mainstream non porn movie with nude men
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=9aacbb372b7d58b338de53b654d1a6343ada50ee8d8b2a48
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=e851d7c231cd538f38de53b654d1a6343c0eaf3e62b11dbf
A Madonna concert posted 2x (different formats) (1 of like 3 madonna concernt ive seen in thr last few days )
This one even says "Hurry Up" - like they know it wil get taken down
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=879ba250bed1716f38de53b654d1a6341e44805d2e4948c7
The below has a scene of an erect penis
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=4e4c0734badcbb6438de53b654d1a634048d6f948f1a841e
Looks like some others I spotted had been taken down or I missed them (I looked for them while my morning coffee brewed :))
I'm curious about it, too, especially in a situation in which a film might have no overtly gay content but is an allegory of gay experience or has been analyzed by academics in the field of queer theory. Would Michelangelo's works qualify as gay themed?
To answer your Michelangelo question - A movie about his life where his character is gay (like he was) would obviously be ok but a documentary solely focused on his work.. i don't know.. i'd say no.. but others may interpret it differently BUT if the documentary was about his life AND his works that had those particular academics discussing things from a queer perspective then i'd say yes.. its a fine line & ive seen debates in comments that would get you thinking
The rules seem open to interpretation to some - in my mind they are pretty straightforward but then that may be my interpretation - see what i mean?