A Very Important Announcement
Hello August 16, 2017, 05:06:28 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
 
   Home   Help Arcade Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: A Very Important Announcement  (Read 346 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
(Hidden)

« on: July 13, 2017, 12:53:35 am »

Hillary Rodham Clinton is not the President of the United States.  She never will be.  She is not a threat to you any longer.  You don't have to be afraid of her anymore.  That is all.
Logged
2x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2017, 01:04:38 am »

Hillary Rodham Clinton is not the President of the United States.  She never will be.  She is not a threat to you any longer.  You don't have to be afraid of her anymore.  That is all.

YES!  Celebrate!   (although.. she has set up a massive PAC.. and is funding all sorts of anti-trump groups.. and vows to resist and obstruct as long as Trump is in office.. she is like a hemorrhoid that won't go away.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GwjfUFyY6M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Jf4UKT7OBk





Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2017, 01:10:25 am »

I wish she would go away too.  Ignore her and maybe she will.
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2017, 02:17:15 am »

Hillary Rodham Clinton is not the President of the United States.  She never will be.  She is not a threat to you any longer.  You don't have to be afraid of her anymore.  That is all.
The problem is the Republicans and others of their ilk, do not know how to lead, but only resist.  They are such a disparate party, that they need a foil to stay together. Apparently Nancy Pelosi is not a big enough witch for them. That's why they continue to rehash the election.
Logged
1x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2017, 09:03:59 am »

But liberals worshipped Hillary.   
Logged



(Hidden)

« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2017, 09:10:36 am »

Even if that were true(which in my opinion it is not.  I think the enthusiasm has more to do with the possibility of a female president, rather than the person herself.) does that justify the continual attacks.  The election is over, as is her political career.  Ding Doing the Hillary witch is dead! (at least in politics--Super PAC or not)
Logged
1x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2017, 09:26:59 am »

Hillary Rodham Clinton is not the President of the United States.  She never will be.  She is not a threat to you any longer.  You don't have to be afraid of her anymore.  That is all.

By any chance, aadam101, did you take the "That is all" closing from the TV comedy, Childrens Hospital?  Such a funny show.

To have a political comment as well, HRC seems to be less present these last few weeks, save the moment when "GOP Twitter" asked if she had a prescription for health care:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/the-gop-asked-hillary-clinton-for-a-health-care-planand-got-burned

Of all the questions you might pick to catch her off-guard, THAT was certainly not the one, lol.

And among Democrats, it's pretty established that generally, liberals worshipped Sanders, while moderates worshipped Clinton.  On the Republican side, the old guard worshipped the baker's dozen of also-rans, while the flat-earthers continue to worship Trump.
Logged
2x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2017, 09:41:10 am »

Even if that were true(which in my opinion it is not.  I think the enthusiasm has more to do with the possibility of a female president, rather than the person herself.) does that justify the continual attacks.  The election is over, as is her political career.  Ding Doing the Hillary witch is dead! (at least in politics--Super PAC or not)

Why should there be enthusiasm for having a female president?  That is a nightmare. 
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #8 on: July 13, 2017, 09:47:37 am »

I wish she would go away too.  Ignore her and maybe she will.

Not a bad idea, but it didn't work with Lord Voldemort   
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #9 on: July 13, 2017, 10:06:41 am »

Even if that were true(which in my opinion it is not.  I think the enthusiasm has more to do with the possibility of a female president, rather than the person herself.) does that justify the continual attacks.  The election is over, as is her political career.  Ding Doing the Hillary witch is dead! (at least in politics--Super PAC or not)

Why should there be enthusiasm for having a female president?  That is a nightmare. 
But it would be a first--another barrier torn down, just like having the first black president.  Democrats should have realized that change comes in short spurts , not waves.  In retrospect, the expectation that the first black president would be succeeded by the first woman president overestimated the nation's ability to embrace change.
There were great blocs of voters who felt their president should be a white male.  That is a big part of MAGA.  Let's get back to the 50's.
That's why liberals and progressives are synonyms.  We are looking to change the future. Conservatives are trying to preserve the past.  The names of the movements are very telling.
Logged
2x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #10 on: July 13, 2017, 01:02:24 pm »

If women wanted a woman President, then there would be a woman president.   

Also, if we didn't vote for 50% of Obama, we were racist.   If we didn't vote for Hillary's vag, we were  sexist. 

Social engineering never works.   
Logged
2x Thumb Down 1x Thumb Up



(Hidden)

« Reply #11 on: July 13, 2017, 06:41:44 pm »

If women wanted a woman President, then there would be a woman president.   

Also, if we didn't vote for 50% of Obama, we were racist.   If we didn't vote for Hillary's vag, we were  sexist. 

Social engineering never works.   

In the election between Richard Nixon and JFK, Nixon would have won if the mafia had not arranged to have dead people voting.  Just a one state difference would have inserted Dick into the Oval Orifice.   But then, when JFK put RFK in as Attorney General (massive nepotism), RFK proceeded to destroy the mafia.  Then for some reason, both JFK and RFK got assassinated.    Anyway... getting back on topic..  JFK would have won easily if he were not Catholic.   But, even with that problem, he did get elected.   Forget about Obama being black.  I don't have a problem with black.  However, it is inconceivable to me that a man with the name Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro) who was raised in Indonesia as a muslim until the age of 13 could ever become president.   

The thing that terrifies me about Hillary is that it is obvious that a large number of people voted for her simply because they want their precious god given right to have a subsidized, guilt-free, no questions asked, abortion on demand, even up until the day of delivery.  That is disgusting. 

The moonbats try to stigmatize anybody that votes for a white man as being racist.   That is ironic, because THEY are the one's being racist!   People forget that the democrats are the party of the KKK during it's darkest days of lynchings, etc.   Go find a native American Indian and ask them about President Andrew Jackson - who created the Democratic Party in 1828.   Who created the Republican Party?  Abraham Lincoln in 1854. 
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #12 on: July 13, 2017, 11:02:04 pm »

I never said those who wanted a white male president were racist, but looking to return to a more socially secure past.
They do not hate blacks or women, but simply want to return to a social structure that seems more stable.
Logged
2x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #13 on: July 13, 2017, 11:11:44 pm »

Hillary Rodham Clinton is not the President of the United States.  She never will be.  She is not a threat to you any longer.  You don't have to be afraid of her anymore.  That is all.

 True Bringing her up in an argument to justify the current president's actions severely weakens the argument. How can someone justify a president's actions by asking, "But what about the candidate who lost during the election that has now been over for 8 months?" It's ridiculous and is not a valid argument at this point. Super PAC does not equal presidential power and influence. In my opinion, we have a corrupt president and his name is not Hillary Clinton.
Logged
2x Thumb Up 1x Thumb Down



(Hidden)

« Reply #14 on: July 13, 2017, 11:18:59 pm »

This says it all...



Logged
1x Thumb Up 1x Grin


(Hidden)

« Reply #15 on: July 14, 2017, 08:46:39 am »

Quote
Forget about Obama being black.  I don't have a problem with black.  However, it is inconceivable to me that a man with the name Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro) who was raised in Indonesia as a muslim until the age of 13 could ever become president.  

I was just pointing out that liberals played the race card to guilt people into voting for Obama.  

They did the same thing with the sex card for Hillary.

We can't vote for the best candidate, we have to vote based on their oppression status.   According to liberals, that is.
Logged
1x Thumb Up



(Hidden)

« Reply #16 on: July 14, 2017, 09:55:56 am »

What you say may be true, but the converse is also true.  How many people did not vote for Obama because he was black?  How many people chose to "otherize" him and claim he was not a citizen because he was black?  How many could not bring themselves to vote for Hillary, no matter how moderate they were or how much they hated Trump simply because she was a woman?  The voting for the best candidate argument runs both ways.
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #17 on: July 14, 2017, 10:27:38 am »

I couldn't vote for Hillary due to her femi-stasi bullshit.     

It's the same reason I didn't vote for Obama the 2nd time.  Well, that and all the lies he told.
Logged
1x Thumb Up



(Hidden)

« Reply #18 on: July 14, 2017, 11:51:54 am »

I never meant to cast aspersions at you.

Of the people who voted for Obama because he was black, not all did so to promote "black power," but to see a barrier come down.  Similarly, the ones who voted for Hillary because she was a woman,  were not all staunch feminists, but  wanted to make history.

Logged
1x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #19 on: July 14, 2017, 01:34:40 pm »

That's still voting for their "oppression" status, not their ability. 
Logged



Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  

* Permissions
You can't post new topics.
You can't post replies.
You can't post attachments.
You can't modify your posts.
BBCode Enabled
Smilies Enabled
[img] Enabled
HTML Disabled

 
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Obama Administration Makes Stunning Announcement On Gay Rights Gay News leatherbear 1 596 Last post February 18, 2012, 05:44:03 am
by fancydude
Shocking Olympics announcement Gay News leatherbear 1 840 Last post September 28, 2013, 01:42:44 pm
by leatherbear
What is more important to you sexually? Sex & Relationships harryme 5 932 Last post December 21, 2015, 10:09:05 am
by jonas32
Justice Ginsburg Makes TRAGIC Announcement Politics & Debate mhorndisk 10 503 Last post June 10, 2017, 10:00:23 am
by pppucci
Trump's probable announcement... and Herr Mueller... Politics & Debate Frederick 3 26 Last post August 04, 2017, 03:50:03 am
by aadam101