I don't think anybody should be defined by their sexual urges.
Agreed, I am not a labels kind of person. However being gay is a label I am proud of.
What's next? The CSRR which are people that only like Chocolate, Strawberry, and Rocky Road ice cream?
Trying being the UK where you get fit into a category based on the brand of tea you drink.
My interest in MALES is a trivial aspect of who I am. But if labels must be applied, at least stick to GAY and not lump me in with lesbians and trannys. Frankly, almost all women are a tad lesbian.. so that is an absurd term. And trannys? Trannys are usually fucked up in the head and nasty.. don't lump me in with them, thanks.
Since trannies are almost all men who identify as women.. who are interested in men.. shouldn't trannies be lumped in with straight people? Yes they should! While we are at it.. bisexuals are by definition both straight and gay.. so why lump them in with the gay people?
Heres a new group they should make.. SWPT Straight, Womanizers, Pedophiles, Trans.
I am not sure if I should just sigh at this or roll up the newspaper. No, you are not labeled as a Lesbian or as trans. No one has ever said to me "Oh you are LGBT."
There are many reasons those letters are together, we shared a combined history and combined struggle. We are an inclusive community that don't discriminate based on sexual preference or gender.
Members of the Trans community should not be lumped in with a community that still fails to accept them to this day. The fact that you think members of the trans community are "fucked up in the head and nasty" actually shocks me. I have a few Trans friends and would not describe any of them that way. Perhaps if you took the time to get to know them you would understand them and would not be as ignorant.
I am sure straight men have said that about "Fags" before, "Don't class them as men and lump me in with them". I don't think you should exclude people who fight for the same rights and acceptance we do.