health care - men are opressed
Hello December 16, 2018, 09:04:38 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
 
   Home   Help Arcade Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: health care - men are opressed  (Read 650 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
(Hidden)

« on: March 07, 2018, 08:30:24 am »

The UK has a very good breast screening program and other female specific health programs. 

The UK has no prostate cancer screening program.   

Bizzarely, though totally expected because #Feminism, they claim that they don't have a prostate cancer screening program because it's not totally reliable.    Here's the good part.   Reliability of prostate cancer screening is about the same as it is for breast and vag cancer, according to the NHS when you do a bit of digging. 

If women got prostate cancer, you know they'd be dumping trillions into it like they do with female specific cancers and whatnot. 

Logged
1x Angry 1x Thumb Up



(Hidden)

« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2018, 03:52:18 am »

True. Its all virtue signalling. Not that PSA tests for example are particularly reliable. The funding though just isn't the same.
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2018, 09:34:44 am »

Obviously, the leftists hate topics like this. 

They scream for gender equality but refuse to call for gender equality when men are harmed.   In other words, they only want sexist man-hating gender equality. 

They bitch about equal representation in the boardroom, but not in the sanitation department at the local council.    They will never whine about professions where women are the majority.   

THE LEFT IS FULL OF SHIT. 
Logged
1x Angry 1x Thumb Up



(Hidden)

« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2018, 01:53:32 am »

It's likely that women implemented breast cancer screening programs.  If men want a prostate cancer screening program they should go implement one.  The problem with this specific issue is that many men have shame or embarrassment around anything to do with the prostate.  Women have taken breast cancer and used it as a sign of strength and courage.  Men could do the same thing. Maybe you should.
Logged
1x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2018, 07:54:44 am »

Women have a stranglehold on medical funding and they will never let it go so men can get a bit of cash for male health issues. 

We see the same thing with social funding and everything else. 

Logged
1x Angry



(Hidden)

« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2018, 02:12:42 pm »

Do you have any actual proof to back up that claim?
Logged
1x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2018, 06:55:12 am »

If you actually paid attention to what goes on in the world, you would see the proof.   

There are virtually no shelters for men, but countless ones for women.   The same thing for medical research.   

Vaginalists pulled the fire alarm to prevent a talk on male-specific health issue which ended in the psycho rant from Chanty Binx.   A few months later there was a near riot over a male suicide talk.   
Logged
1x Angry 1x Thumb Up



(Hidden)

« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2018, 02:59:17 am »

If you actually paid attention to what goes on in the world, you would see the proof.   

There are virtually no shelters for men, but countless ones for women.   The same thing for medical research.   

Vaginalists pulled the fire alarm to prevent a talk on male-specific health issue which ended in the psycho rant from Chanty Binx.   A few months later there was a near riot over a male suicide talk.   

You are totally wrong on both counts. There are men's shelters where I live.  There are also women's shelters and family shelters.  I live in the only state that has a "right to shelter" law. 

There is also tons of medical research for men.  I see ads all the time for various medical studies that are for men only.  This may be because I live in an area with a lot of teaching hospitals.

My guess in all of this is that you really want to live in a blue state.  All of the things you are complaining about are not problems in blue states.  You have just been brainwashed into believing that Conservatism is the answer when it seems to me that you don't actually believe in it.
Logged
1x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2018, 09:43:54 am »

It has nothing to do with Blue or Red states.   It's a gender issue and both parties pander to the vag.    The same with all of the west.

I also think you are confusing homeless shelters run by charities and domestic violence that are either run by "the state" or run by "charities" run for the state.   

My dad used our inheritance to create a domestic violence shelter for males because he was sick that women are treated like victims and handed everything when they are just as guilty as men.   The found it extremely difficult to find funding and several times nearly had to shut down. 

Do some proper research and look at the amounts of funding for things like lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer and you will see that while lung cancer is the biggest killer, it gets less funding than breast cancer, with prostate cancer coming in a distant 3rd despite being on par with breast cancer. 

Scotland's vaginalist SNP government only gave the HPV vaccine to girls, just because.   Eventually, they started giving it to boys.     The same with the rest of the UK, but rUK never claimed to be a bunch of vaginalists for equality, like we have in Scotland.   

We see supposed non-gendered laws with names like "women and girls in sport", "violence against women and girls" and whatnot.   The vaginalist claims are that while the names "might" be gendered, the laws themselves are non-gendered.


As a Hillary-ite, you believe that women are the primary victims of war because they lose the men in their lives in combat.   

Unlike your kind, I won't riot to prevent a gender-specific talk on things like mental health and health issues. 
Logged
1x Angry



(Hidden)

« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2018, 06:17:59 am »

Anyone with open eyes can see that medical funding for 'women's problems' is disproportionately favoured, despite men's health outcomes on virtually every metric being worse than women's. Also suicide, untimely death from various causes, violent assault, overwhelmingly are male issues, yet the media never talks about them
Logged
1x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2018, 10:17:30 am »

OOOPS. 

I was wrong.  Scotland, despite the government saying they would start giving the HPV vaccine to males still denies males the vaccine. 

Stupid me for believing vaginalists when they say they are gonna do something good for males.
Logged



(Hidden)

« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2018, 04:54:33 am »

Here's the good part.   Reliability of prostate cancer screening is about the same as it is for breast and vag cancer, according to the NHS when you do a bit of digging. 

Can you please provide links to your sources? I'm of the age where this is an issue and unless I'm able to point to reliable research there's no way I'd be able to get any GP to listen.
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2018, 09:35:34 am »

I'll have to dig for some sources.

Anyway, breast cancer screening looks for lumps (like the finger up the butt does), but it can't tell the difference between a fat cyst, scar tissue, and a cancerous tumor.  So they need a biopsy.   Women get breast cancer screening automatically from 47 to 70, but can have it at any time, by requesting the screening.  They can get it once a year, unless they have a specific reason for wanting more or prescribed by a specialist.

PSA tests only tell if you have evaluated levels of Prostate Specific Antigens in your blood.  It fluctuates, naturally.  If it's always high, then there's most likely a problem.  

FREE PSA tests look for Prostate Specific Antigens in the body fluids (mostly in urine and blood plasma).  Free PSA is not bound to blood proteins, making it easier to detect.

DRE (finger up the butt) exams are only taught in UK medical schools as a lecture, so your average GP won't know how to properly do this.  Only specialists have "hands-on" experience in a meaningful way.

Biomarker tests looks for tumor cells in bodily fluids and tissue.   You can look for specific types of cancer or you can just do a general screening.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2018, 10:39:26 am by (Hidden) » Logged



(Hidden)

« Reply #13 on: November 19, 2018, 09:46:17 am »

https://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5224

Quote
After deduction of clinical lead time cancers, 32% of cancers found in women invited to screening in 2010-12 and 52% of screen detected cancers would be overdiagnosed.

https://prostatecanceruk.org/prostate-information/prostate-tests/psa-test#advantages-and-disadvantages-of-the-psa-test

Quote
The PSA test can miss prostate cancer. 1 in 7 men (15 per cent) with a normal PSA level may have prostate cancer, and 1 in 50 men (two per cent) with a normal PSA may have a fast-growing prostate cancer.

So, breast cancer screening has a 52% failure rate, but Prostate cancer screning has a 15% and 2% failure rate. 

Oddly, the official reasons not to have a prostate exam is that you "might worry" about the results, but they don't say that to women about breast cancer screening. 
Logged



(Hidden)

« Reply #14 on: November 19, 2018, 09:58:17 am »

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/prostate-cancer-risk-management-programme-overview

In the UK, you have a legal right to the PSA and/or other prostate cancer tests.  HOWEVER, GPs are forbidden from mentioning them unless you have symptoms that cause the GP concern. 
Logged



(Hidden)

« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2018, 02:07:00 pm »

Thanks for the links, time to read up and have a chat - if that's possible.
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2018, 04:48:24 am »

This is just MRA trolling and nonsense.
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2018, 07:42:13 am »

This is just MRA trolling and nonsense.

Please prove me wrong on any of the above-mentioned topics. 

You clearly worship at the altar of vaginalism and all its dogma.   

I am an egalitarian.   I believe in true gender equality, which is why I despise vaginalism. 
Logged



(Hidden)

« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2018, 05:07:49 pm »

I think the reason that people are not recommended to get prostate exams before a certain age is because of how prone people are to false positives. Which means that people get unnecessary, risky surgery that is utterly unnecessary. It's not because of "vaginalism"  Cheesy but because people are concerned about their patients' health.

https://www.theprostatecentre.com/prostate-information/the-psa-test/problems-with-the-psa/
Logged
1x Lamp


(Hidden)

« Reply #19 on: December 12, 2018, 11:14:23 pm »

Umm, did you read what I posted?  I mentioned the stuff you just said.   I also showed the false results for both prostate and breast screening. 

By your "logic", we should end breast cancer screening based on the numbers from the links I posted earlier.

Breast cancer screening has a 52% false positive rate.   End that shit since it's so unreliable.   Oh wait, we won't because VAGINA. 

Also, you clearly missed the main bit of the prostate cancer topic in this thread.   The UK does not have a prostate cancer screening program, at all.   It's not about age, but about not doing it for prostate cancer at all. 

The UK has a breast cancer screening program for women, despite the 52% false positive rate.

The UK (at least in Scotland) still doesn't give males the HPV vaccine.   The excuse is that if you protect the vagina, then males will be covered too.  HOWEVER, not all males shag women.   ALSO, not all women get the vaccine.    Despite the fact that males are harder affected by it, who fucking cares, because vagina.


   
Logged



Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  

* Permissions
You can't post new topics.
You can't post replies.
You can't post attachments.
You can't modify your posts.
BBCode Enabled
Smilies Enabled
[img] Enabled
HTML Disabled

 
Jump to: