"This is Disputed!" - Twitter
Hello January 25, 2021, 11:32:48 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: "This is Disputed!" - Twitter  (Read 428 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
(Hidden)

« on: November 29, 2020, 02:35:58 am »

Well yes, twit-idiots... the tweet itself is a dispute of the other side, with evidence filed in court, so why don't their tweets get labelled "disputed," when they say Biden won? So the Commander in Chief is disputed, but his dispute of the other side isn't? When he's taking it to court, literally disputing it? It's game over. Trump won.  

EDIT - removed banned word - raphjd
« Last Edit: November 29, 2020, 06:47:01 am by (Hidden) » Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2020, 06:48:10 am »

haha, that's a joke right!? the word idiot is banned? like can we ever say the word idiot again? what's going on...? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
« Last Edit: November 29, 2020, 07:16:41 am by (Hidden) » Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2020, 07:27:25 am »

That's right all you mother fuckers!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA It most CERTAINLY IS, DISPUTED... TWATTER.
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2020, 07:28:43 am »

Can I say mother fuckers? What about cunts? I hear dicksuckers wasn't nice. They didn't like it HAHAHAHAHAHA
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2020, 07:37:04 am »

Like, its disputed, but not by YOU! You fuckwit. Why is Jack Dorsey so stupid?
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2020, 10:08:08 am »

Retard, tard, and related are banned. 
Logged



(Hidden)

« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2020, 02:29:33 pm »

Someone here doesn't seem to understand why I objected to DICK SUCKER.

Not because my feelings were hurt - quite the contrary, that's a problem for the "f-- your feelings"  Trump-supporting crowd (lol).

Not because I'm a SJW, or snow flake, or whatever slur is fashionable now.

But because this is a QUEER site, where presumably we recognize that HOMOPHOBIA exists, and that it ruins lives.

If amazes me that in the year 2020 some individuals can still get off on Queer porn one moment - then attack Queer people the next.

Check your head ?
Logged
1x Thumb Up


(Hidden)

« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2020, 02:13:07 am »

I'm not attacking queer people. I'm gay. You are actually the one being offensive associating gay people with dick suckers. Dick sucker could be a girl. It's over half the population. It's like me saying "you stupid sheep." Why don't you find it offensive when liberal technocrats say we're all "weak? (like sheep)." They do. I've been through the training. Doesn't that mean sheep to be suckled upon? Cows to be milked? You think the politicians in the democratic party care about you? Not saying I think the repubs do either, I know neither one do, and we're fighting each other over their words. Did the church brainwash you into thinking that dick sucking was bad? Did they tell you that sucking dick is gay?

Sucking dick is all great here I thought... I didn't think that dicksucker was the same thing as the f word. Does cocksucking mean homosexual? Or is there a difference? I know some gay dudes that don't liek to suck it, and some girls (not from experience). It was made in jest. Get over it. More feigned victimhood and attention seeking and virtue signaling. That's all you guys know how to do. Noted, I said twit **** and I won't use that word again. That word is not acceptable on this forum, but cocksucker seems to be ok, and that doesn't mean the f word, the 6 letter word.

I can't believe I have to explain this to you.... the use of the term cocksucker, is because in that position you are vulnerable. It has nothing to do with your sexuality, and if you feel shame from the word, that's your problem. I know it makes you feel vulnerable, hence the reason you're so offended by it. So you wanna not feel the shame of putting that juicy dick in your mouth... if you feel shame, that's your problem. I knew you did though, hence the reason I trolled you. There. Now you understand I'm pressing your buttons. And you guys said you'd never respond to me again, but now you're all on the pounce. I control you. Like a marionette. Just like that big slurpy you intend to suck upon salaciously like the cock hungry bitch that you are.

I'm offended by your stereotype that gay people and dicksuckers are the same thing, and offended by the idea that you'd try to twist my words around to say that's what I represented. I was not talking about gay people when I called the FBI dicksuckers. I was talking about the FBI being incompetent and why do we have them if lawyers can expose all this election fraud but they aint got nothing to say. You want to defund-ing the police? There they are. Now you're defend-ing them? You call the police fry em pigs like bacon. That's the police. Suddenly they're good. There was a celebrity recently who called for defunding the police, then she had to call them. Police are "good" when you call it "socialism" then it's bad so defund it. Just nothing works with libs.

You can't win either way. You're either gentrifying or white flighting, you're appropriating or ignoring, etc. You're the borg. You have no individualism, just a bunch of blue hair and tattoos like you're special.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2020, 05:47:59 am by (Hidden) » Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2020, 09:52:21 am »

See, liberals have forced "queer" on us and called us names if we complain.  But that's ok because they are the "good" people who get to decide everything.

I got into a Twitter argument with the head of HuffPo about this and she demanded that I am a homophobe for being against "queer" despite me pointing out the history of the word which is why so many of my age hating it.
Logged



(Hidden)

« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2020, 06:13:37 pm »

See, liberals have forced "queer" on us and called us names if we complain.  But that's ok because they are the "good" people who get to decide everything.

I got into a Twitter argument with the head of HuffPo about this and she demanded that I am a homophobe for being against "queer" despite me pointing out the history of the word which is why so many of my age hating it.

So, being older... you should also be aware of how language changes.  What might be inoffensive to you, could be highly offensive to someone else... and vice versa.  Also being older, you're the one who will have to accept what the younger generation wants - as they are less familiar with this concept... and it's also down to you to educate them about it.  (I recommend: telling stories!)

I would imagine, rather like most people who come across you here, the Head of Huffington Post was probably going by what you are like as a person... and associating that with homophobia, rather than you disliking the word queer.  I also suspect that you only explained latterly why you disliked the word.  (I could be wrong, but I'm guessing, based on our interactions here... happy to be proven wrong!).
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2020, 06:17:48 pm »

I'm not attacking queer people. I'm gay. You are actually the one being offensive associating gay people with dick suckers. Dick sucker could be a girl. It's over half the population. It's like me saying "you stupid sheep." Why don't you find it offensive when liberal technocrats say we're all "weak? (like sheep)." They do. I've been through the training. Doesn't that mean sheep to be suckled upon? Cows to be milked? You think the politicians in the democratic party care about you? Not saying I think the repubs do either, I know neither one do, and we're fighting each other over their words. Did the church brainwash you into thinking that dick sucking was bad? Did they tell you that sucking dick is gay?

Sucking dick is all great here I thought... I didn't think that dicksucker was the same thing as the f word. Does cocksucking mean homosexual? Or is there a difference? I know some gay dudes that don't liek to suck it, and some girls (not from experience). It was made in jest. Get over it. More feigned victimhood and attention seeking and virtue signaling. That's all you guys know how to do. Noted, I said twit **** and I won't use that word again. That word is not acceptable on this forum, but cocksucker seems to be ok, and that doesn't mean the f word, the 6 letter word.

I can't believe I have to explain this to you.... the use of the term cocksucker, is because in that position you are vulnerable. It has nothing to do with your sexuality, and if you feel shame from the word, that's your problem. I know it makes you feel vulnerable, hence the reason you're so offended by it. So you wanna not feel the shame of putting that juicy dick in your mouth... if you feel shame, that's your problem. I knew you did though, hence the reason I trolled you. There. Now you understand I'm pressing your buttons. And you guys said you'd never respond to me again, but now you're all on the pounce. I control you. Like a marionette. Just like that big slurpy you intend to suck upon salaciously like the cock hungry bitch that you are.

I'm offended by your stereotype that gay people and dicksuckers are the same thing, and offended by the idea that you'd try to twist my words around to say that's what I represented. I was not talking about gay people when I called the FBI dicksuckers. I was talking about the FBI being incompetent and why do we have them if lawyers can expose all this election fraud but they aint got nothing to say. You want to defund-ing the police? There they are. Now you're defend-ing them? You call the police fry em pigs like bacon. That's the police. Suddenly they're good. There was a celebrity recently who called for defunding the police, then she had to call them. Police are "good" when you call it "socialism" then it's bad so defund it. Just nothing works with libs.

You can't win either way. You're either gentrifying or white flighting, you're appropriating or ignoring, etc. You're the borg. You have no individualism, just a bunch of blue hair and tattoos like you're special.

I see you've created yet another straw man argument here... this is not the reason the man gave for being offended.  If you read what he wrote, you will see why he finds it offensive.  Just because you don't doesn't mean someone else won't. 

So your entire paragraph is... meaningless.  It's literally arguing about something the person didn't say and didn't mean. 
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2020, 04:19:09 am »

Sticks and stones! He wasn't offended. He feels shame in sucking cock and took it personally LMAO sorry it's just true.
Logged


(Hidden)

« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2020, 03:12:40 pm »

Sticks and stones! He wasn't offended. He feels shame in sucking cock and took it personally LMAO sorry it's just true.

No, he doesn't - as he clearly said.  If you want to believe that, it's fine... but it's not true and has no place here. 

If you can't understand your interlocutors, I suggest you don't engage with people.  It's only going to make you look silly.
Logged


Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  

* Permissions
You can't post new topics.
You can't post replies.
You can't post attachments.
You can't modify your posts.
BBCode Enabled
Smilies Enabled
[img] Enabled
HTML Disabled

 
Jump to: