It's a simple question. Did she step down because the DNC was hacked, because Seth Rich leaked the info, or because the CONTENT of the emails PROVED they were tricksters acting fraudulently? This is something liberals HATE, because they know the REAL answer. She didn't step down because she was hacked. She didn't step down because Seth leaked the emails to WikiLeaks. She stepped down because the CONTENT of the leaks PROVED she was a liar and a fraud. Plain and simple. But I'd like to see if you disagree. I'm tired of people using Russia as a deflection from the content of the emails, which proved they are fraudsters.
I haven't heard anyone deny that what happened to Wasserman-Shultz was her own fault. But teh fact is that the Russians hacked into the DNC with malicious intent, and then planted false emails among the real ones to further interfere with the elction. In fact, one of these emails was said to have influenced Comey going public with his announcements on Hillary, which certainly did affect the election. The FBI knew the email was a fake, but they were afraid it would leak and make the Justice Department look bad.
The Russians also planted false stories in social media
Putin is not a Republican, Democrat, liberal or conservative--he is an opportunist. Who knows who he will go after next. If they had hacked the Trump campaign to elect Hillary, you would be calling for an all-out invasion.